hulu

The biggest players in technology have been vying for your living room (otherwise referred to as the “10ft interface”) for years now. The only problem is that no one has gotten it quite right yet, but the device and software manufacturers may not be to blame.

Core Problem

As Steve Jobs clearly pointed out at a recent conference, the problem isn’t really with the hardware or software of 3rd party devices (such as an Xbox 360, AppleTV, Boxee Box etc) but the problem actually lays with the Cable and content distributors. The business model that these companies deploy make the cable box a free or incredibly low cost part of the business and have thrust the competition out of a good “go to market” strategy.

We all know that the software on Cable boxes is beyond terrible and is in fact probably the worst UX I have ever seen. The devices are slow, the results laden with advertisements, multiple versions of a show (HD or SD?) and programming comes around a clock set by the networks. Obviously On-Demand content helps alleviate this problem some, but there is more to it than that.

What about content variety, being able to watch it when you want to? Are you willing to “pay to play”, or are you willing to take a barrage of advertisements to offset the cost to view content? What about some kind of happy medium where your cost is reduced, but you also get less ads? These are all potential ideas that are being implemented, but lets dive a little deeper.

Solutions

There are essentially 3 accepted business models for approaching this pain in the marketplace, each filled with heavy hitting players. Here are some of the notable ones:

Advertisements – Good content, zero price

In a world where consumers are trained that there IS such a thing as a free lunch due to services like Napster, BitTorrent and others we have come to demand access to high quality content without paying a penny. Google did a great job delivering free text based information to the masses through their AdSense program that allowed content producers to display advertisements against their content in hopes of tricking customers visitors finding value in ads so they could get paid.

Most people thought that premium video content had finally arrived after Hulu launched with a ridiculous name, backing of the major studios (thanks to their heavy equity investments) and high end advertisements pre-roll and interruption clips that were clickable and offered up other metric advantages over traditional ads.

http://www.hulu.com

Pay-to-Play – Top notch content, top notch price

As advertisers were weary to plunk down large media buys for sites like Hulu in a diversified way (that the studios would accept), we saw video content from the likes of Apple (a la iTunes) and Amazon race in to fill the void of people who were looking for a wider variety than what was offered by Hulu or perhaps would rather pay a hefty penny to avoid the annoying interface that advertisements offer. Both services now have accompanying hardware to deliver their content to our favorite screen – the TV.

These models have simply followed in the footsteps of dvd and blu-ray sales but are more agile in that they can deliver on a per episode basis, are without a physical disc and other common digital only advantages. Microsoft has been another player in this space that has been innovating without nearly as much press through their Zune Video service. Delivering fantastic 1080p video with 5.1 surround sound through a well established user base of Xbox 360 users.

http://www.Apple.com/iTunes

http://www.Amazon.com

http://www.Zune.net

http://www.Netflix.com

Hybrid – Minimal annoyance, premium content on demand

The 3rd category is both the newest player to the game and the oldest at the exact same time. We are used to paying for content with advertisements baked in (cable, satellite etc), but now Hulu Plus hopes to take this model with on-demand into more places and with less storage concerns. Hulu Plus works with iOS devices (iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch), select TV’s (apps), blu-ray players and soon even the Xbox 360. The catch? It’s $10/month and still has advertisements. However, for that compromise you get beautiful HD quality content, the entire current season instead of just the last few selected episodes.

http://www.hulu.com/plus

But what about the newest player? Google TV holds intense promise because it tries to take the best points from each model and mesh them together. In fact, Google isn’t trying to be in your second input from a second box, they want to go for the gold be in your first input as the information source and/or as an overlay to your current video stream. They bring “the whole web” to your favorite screen and if you are using Dish Network you can even schedule DVR recordings etc right from the Google interface. Existing Android Apps will work in the environment which leaves a wide open door for rapid innovation.

Great, but when?

Google TV lands sooner than you think with an expected delivery date of October 11, 2010. Like Hulu Plus, we can expect it to be on select hardware launch partners (which looks like a Sony TV and a Logitech Harmony box for existing setups). We can expect however, given the nature of android based software and development to see this great software on a ton of different devices and ecosystems. How do you think Apple, Amazon and Microsoft are going to respond to this new player? Video of the Google TV features below.

http://www.google.com/tv/

With all the fanfare surrounding Hulu after it’s launch (especially in the College scene) as a free LEGAL way to watch premium TV shows (movies are available too, but have traditionally been lackluster). As Netflix got serious about their “Watch Instantly” offerings, many people found themselves signing up for the $9.99/month because it brought many students armed with their existing xbox 360 to get quality content onto their TV’s in a way that wouldn’t have the schools IT department knocking on their door and/or turning off their bandwidth.

So what is Hulu’s response to the higher resolution Netflix offerings? Hulu has notoriously been a completely free offering which was monetized through targeted advertisements, so it was only natural that Hulu would try to have more users (or at least more active) by offering higher quality resolution video across more devices (read: iDevices), and that service came under the name of Hulu +. “Great!” you may be thinking, and at a price of $10/month for recent episodes presented in High Definition it sounds fair.. until you realize that they STILL HAVE ADS.

Hulu has proven more than once that they are driven completely by the content owners (read: taken by the balls), so much in fact that the content owners are arrogant enough to think that with the age of the internet, we as consumers are stupid enough to pay for ad laden content. Hulu is even on record for pleading with ABC to NOT launch their free application on the iPad that gives users access to recent, quality content without an added fee.

Recently, according to ComScore, Netflix has edged out Hulu in traffic across their domain. While ComScore is not a greatly reliable source for accurate information, their trending data is a great gauge for how consumers are voting with their dollars. Why isn’t Hulu absolutely CRUSHING IT with a freemium model right now? Hulu could easily be syndicating their Advertisement laden content across as many devices as possible at standard definition, with an upsell of advertisement free and higher resolution content. In the Internet age, customers are voting that with ads the content should be free, and with a fee it should be high quality and delivered without advertisements.

Freemium is an amazing way to drive user base, upsell opportunities and other revenue generating procedures that continue to drive value for the consumers in exchange for their usage and/or their dollars.